Ember Data and Custom APIs - 5 Common Serializer Customizations

Last reviewed on January 23, 2016

When I first started working with Ember Data in the 1.X days, one of the most frustrating things was having to work with custom APIs. This wasn't because of Ember Data but because I was new to it and there is a lot to learn. I was motivated to use Ember Data but I just couldn't get it to work with whatever API I was using at the time. Do I massage the data in an adapter or a serializer? What is the difference between normalizeReponse() and normalize() in serializers? How do I handle related data that is nested? I had lots of questions like these. Even today I see a lot of the same questions being asked on the Ember Discussion Forum about getting Ember Data to work with custom APIs. In this post, I'd like to share a few common ways to customize serializers that others might be wanting to make as well, especially those new to the framework.

If your API is built with Rails, then it's likely it is following the conventions expected by Ember Data and everything just works. For those who don't have control over the API, some customizations might be needed to manipulate responses before they are handed off to the data store or data is sent back to the server. This data massaging happens in the serializer layer.

A serializer in Ember Data is used to massage data as it is transferred between the client and the persistence layer. This includes manipulating attribute values, normalizing property names, serializing relationships, and adjusting the structure of request payloads and responses.

Before we get started, it might be useful to read my other post Which Ember Data Serializer Should I Use? which goes into detail about the serializers built into Ember and their expected formats.

1. normalizeResponse() and normalize()

Imagine you make a GET request to /cats and your API returns a JSON response containing an array of items under a root key called data.

{
  "data": [
    { "id": 1, "name": "Tubby" },
    { "id": 2, "name": "Frisky" },
    { "id": 3, "name": "Tabitha" }
  ]
}

This format is pretty similar to the RESTSerializer format, except the root key is data as opposed to the model name. One way we can manipulate this is by creating a model specific serializer that extends RESTSerializer and override normalizeResponse():

ember generate serializer cat
app/serializers/cat.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
  normalizeResponse(store, primaryModelClass, payload, id, requestType) {
    payload = {
      cats: payload.data,
    };

    return this._super(store, primaryModelClass, payload, id, requestType);
  },
});

The normalizeResponse() method is used to normalize a payload from the server to a JSON-API document (the JSON API spec). Rather than creating and returning the JSON-API document directly, we can instead modify the payload to fit the RESTSerializer conventions, that is, a payload with a root key containing the model name, and calling this._super() which will return a JSON-API compliant document. I have found this approach to be simpler than massaging the data to fit the JSON-API format directly.

Another way we could have handled this is by using the JSONSerializer.

app/serializers/cat.js
export default DS.JSONSerializer.extend({
  normalizeResponse(store, primaryModelClass, payload, id, requestType) {
    return this._super(store, primaryModelClass, payload.data, id, requestType);
  },
});

Because JSONSerializer expects the payload to contain the data without any root keys, we can simply extract that data property.

Similar to normalizeResponse(), serializers also have methods that match specific data store calls. For example, if you want to normalize data only when store.findAll() is called, you can use normalizeFindAllResponse() instead.

To normalize only a single model for an endpoint such as /cats/1, use the normalize() method.

export default DS.JSONSerializer.extend({
  normalize(modelClass, resourceHash, prop) {
    return this._super(modelClass, resourceHash.data, prop);
  },
});

Both RESTSerializer and JSONSerializer can be extended, but which approach is better? This brings us to the next customization: handling relationships.

2. Handling Relationships

Now imagine your payload looks like this:

{
  "data": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "name": "Tubby",
      "breed": { "id": 4, "name": "Bengal cat" }
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "name": "Frisky",
      "breed": { "id": 6, "name": "Persian cat" }
    }
  ]
}

and your model looks like this:

app/models/cat.js
export default DS.Model.extend({
  name: DS.attr('string'),
  breed: DS.belongsTo('breed', { async: false }),
});

Each cat has a belongsTo relationship to another model called breed. The related data is nested within each cat object as opposed to being sideloaded. In its current format, the breed relationship won't be setup properly. Let's change that by overriding normalizeResponse():

app/serializers/cat.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
  normalizeResponse(store, primaryModelClass, payload, id, requestType) {
    let breeds = this._collectBreeds(payload.data);
    let cats = this._normalizeCats(payload.data);
    let normalizedPayload = {
      cats: cats,
      breeds: breeds,
    };

    return this._super(
      store,
      primaryModelClass,
      normalizedPayload,
      id,
      requestType
    );
  },

  _collectBreeds(cats) {
    return cats.map(cat => {
      return cat.breed;
    });
  },

  _normalizeCats(cats) {
    return cats.map(cat => {
      cat.breed = cat.breed.id;
      return cat;
    });
  },
});

By extending RESTSerializer, we can extract breed from each cat and create a payload where the related data is sideloaded under the key breeds. We also need to modify breed on each cat so that it equals breed.id as opposed to the full breed object.

EDIT: There is a simpler way to do this using embedded records.

So back to the question, should you extend RESTSerializer or JSONSerializer? If you have nested models, extend RESTSerializer so that you can normalize the related data to be sideloaded.

3. Mapping Attributes to Model Properties

Many APIs return properties that are snake_cased:

[
  {
    "id": 1,
    "first_name": "Tubby",
    "years": 4
  }
]

Although you could work with snake_cased attributes in your app, this isn't the JavaScript convention. If you'd like to map these to camelCased properties, or map any attribute to another property on your model for that matter, you can specify this mapping in the attrs attribute.

app/serializers/cat.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
  attrs: {
    firstName: 'first_name',
    age: 'years',
  },
});

first_name gets mapped to firstName and years gets mapped to age on your model.

Note there is an ember addon to help automate mapping snake_cased attributes to camelCased attributes called Ember Data ActiveModel Adapter that you might find useful.

4. Relationship Attributes

Using the attrs attribute can be useful if you want to map specific attributes. But what if your API follows a convention of xxx_id for every belongsTo relationship? This is a pretty common convention in relational databases that you end up seeing in APIs. For every model you'd have to create a serializer and specify the attribute mappings in attrs. Instead, a better way might be to override the method keyForRelationship in an application serializer.

app/serializers/application.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
  keyForRelationship(key, relationship) {
    if (relationship === 'belongsTo') {
      return `${key}_id`;
    }
  },
});

Now a JSON payload with foreign keys like home_id and owner_id can map to our model attributes home and owner containing belongsTo relationships:

{
  "cat": {
    "id": 1,
    "name": "Fiona",
    "home_id": 3,
    "owner_id": 2
  }
}
app/models/cat.js
export default DS.Model.extend({
  name: DS.attr('string'),
  home: DS.belongsTo('home'),
  owner: DS.belongsTo('owner'),
});

5. Setting the Primary Key

Ember Data expects every record to have an attribute called id. If a record needs to use another field as its id, you can specify this using the primaryKey property:

app/serializers/user.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
  primaryKey: 'socialSecurityNumber',
});

Here we are changing the id attribute to be socialSecurityNumber instead for the user model. When you want to access socialSecurityNumber throughout your application, you can do:

model.get('id');

If all of your records use a property like _id as the id, then you might want to override primaryKey in an application serializer. If you want to override id for a specific model such as in this example, then you might want to create a model specific serializer.

Conclusion

There are different takes on what API payloads should look like and they won't always follow the formats expected by the default Ember Data serializers. Hopefully this post helps reduce some of the frustration that I experienced when I first started using Ember Data with custom APIs. What serializer customizations have you made? Let me know in the comments!


Pro Ember Data cover
Pro Ember Data available now!

Are you struggling with Ember Data?

In my new book Pro Ember Data, you will learn how to work with Ember Data efficiently, from APIs, adapters, and serializers to polymorphic relationships, using your existing JavaScript and Ember knowledge. This book will teach you how to adapt Ember Data to fit your custom API.

What You'll Learn

  • Review the differences between normalization and serialization
  • Understand how the built-in adapters and serializers in Ember Data
  • Understand how the built-in adapters and serializers in Ember Data work
  • Customize adapters and serializers to consume any API and write them from scratch
  • Handle API errors in Ember Data
  • Work with the Reddit API using Ember Data
  • Learn how to use polymorphic relationships
Check out Pro Ember Data on Amazon using my affiliate link
You can also find Pro Ember Data on Apress.

I've been enjoying @iamdtang's Pro Ember Data book. It's to the point and has lots of great examples. My favorite part was about error handling. This book is perfect after you've exhausted the official guides.

Ilya Radchenko

Product Developer at Applied Geographics

Ilya Radchenko

Pro Ember Data is such an approachable book @iamdtang! Good job. Loving the book so far! Thank you!

Lenora Porter

Software Engineer at Heroku

Lenora Porter

Great to see all those topics in which I struggled when I started working on Ember. Nice job, will check it out :)

AbulAsar S

Fullstack Developer

AbulAsar S

I haven't read David's new book, but his previous Ember Data book helped me a lot when I was starting out with Ember, so I am sure this book is a must if you're working with Ember Data!

Kenneth Larsen

Ember Learning Core Team member

Kenneth Larsen

I bought Ember Data in the Wild back in 2016 and found it really helpful. Looking forward to reading this.

@EmberLinks

Ember related news by Chris Masters

@EmberLinks